Oped comments

english 015

tianru peng

WP2 draft 1

comment1

In the latest developments, trump vetoed the house and senate resolutions opposing the national emergency order without much hesitation. At the same time, trump simply said, "you have the power to pass the resolution, and I have the power to veto it."
Under the U.S. constitution, after President Donald trump vetoes a bill in congress, both Chambers of congress have one more chance: to review and vote again. If two-thirds of both Chambers support a veto, this time he must approve it. As things stand, it is unlikely that two-thirds of the nation's lawmakers will forget trump's "national emergency order". The next step will be the judicial process, with the final decision on the dispute between the President and congress decided by vote of the nine Supreme Court justices.
The "national emergency decree" is directly related to trump's major decision of building a wall on the southern border. Second, the pentagon has estimated that $12.9 billion could be spent on the wall, far more than trump expected. Third, trump also targeted a large amount of dirty money for drug crimes, which can also be used for building walls.
At great political risk, the funding problem was solved. Taking a step back, President trump, an architect by training, can unleash the energy of his successful real estate developers to build a border wall to keep out illegal immigrants.

comment 2

According to the latest news that Democrats control the house of representatives of the day in the capital of Washington, district of Columbia, the federal district court in the United States, 45 - page indictment against the federal government, ministry of finance, the department of homeland security, the ministry of defense and the ministry of the interior and the department head, accused of trump administrative power beyond the constitution granted by the government, in the absence of appropriate congressional appropriations, the use of funds allocated to other government departments, congress spending as much as $8.1 billion to build walls along the border, in violation of the terms and the constitutional principle of separation of powers.


Trump's campaign pledge was to build a wall, and his election as President reflected the will of the people. Citizens' attitudes to the wall are consensual, as are the dangers of the border and the drugs that cross it.

Those who say that building walls is useless, if you are willing to tear down the walls of your home and leave the doors open, will you? Building a wall has its benefits, too. I hope Democrats don't get carried away by partisan fights against trump. More for the good of the country's borders and the good of the taxpayers.

The border crisis is a big issue that needs to be addressed urgently, and I hope the house can properly arbitrate this proposal.

Inefficient comments

The 1% and other rich don't feel that way and the more power we give to them through tax breaks and corporate welfare and adulation the more they will push the poor down.

I came to the US alone at age 17, with two years of (very good) gimnazium education. Poor? Maybe, but I worked my way through to a Ph.D. What's to prevent others to do something like that?

So lucid, thank you.

He knows how to communicate!

I would like to know what is being done about the absurd cost of higher education? It is disgraceful.



I think these comments are ineffective cause they are not actually achieving the “moves”, not even their thoughts.

Efficient comments

Mr. Jemmott, I wish you much success in your future! As a CUNY graduate, I’m glad to hear you go to Queens College. The City University of New York offers opportunity to all those who rise to the challenge, and I believe you did.



Xand makes several reasonable points. However, there are countless resources, many of them free of charge, that are available to anyone and everyone who is applying to a college. For the low income students who are excelling in their high schools, colleges will seek out those students and make them offers which would be practically impossible to refuse. For the below-average and marginal students, there is no shame in attending a local community college and gaining the requisite background/resources to navigate the complexities of college financial aid, etc. Small steps always come before big steps.



One of my friends, a single mom who had left an abusive husband, had he audacity to try to go to college and improve her life while she was collecting federal benefits. The benefits programs imposed requirements on her that nearly derailed her college education. At one point, she had to go to a mandatory benefits “training” that was the exact same week as finals at school, and no amount of pleading could get the training rescheduled. Most of her state college professors worked with her needs, but she failed and had to retake one class because she couldn’t take the final at the appointed time

I think these comments are effective cause the writers achieved moves , and they actually use actual numbers and experience examples to show the reality in America. The people can’t afford the titution and the reason why school need to take care of the poor students, how the low fees help the poor student in real life.